Facebook shaping up as main election battleground in Covid-19 era

With large gatherings banned, campaigns will shift focus to Myanmar’s 22 million social media users, raising new questions for election commission

Published on Jun 30, 2020
A netizen scrolls through the USDP Facebook page (Photo- Myo Set Paing/ Myanmar Now)
A netizen scrolls through the USDP Facebook page (Photo- Myo Set Paing/ Myanmar Now)

On a rain-soaked morning in downtown Yangon in mid-May, five young men busied themselves in a small room above Latha road, which was free of the usual noise and crowds thanks to the Covid-19 lockdown.

The men were working on computers and digital cameras to edit a video outlining the People’s Pioneer Party’s (PPP) Covid-19 economic recovery plan. 

The room serves as the new party’s headquarters, and the men are its social media team.

Officially, parties cannot begin campaigning until 60 days prior to the election. In May the Union Election Commission (UEC) confirmed this year’s elections will take place in November, though it has yet to set a specific date. 

 

 

Still, several parties are already beginning to make their presences felt online, where a disproportionate share of campaigning will take place as Covid-19 restrictions rule out large public gatherings.

Social media is shaping up to be the main battleground of this year’s election, in a country that has only held one national poll deemed legitimate in living memory and is relatively new to the internet. 

 

 

So election officials must grapple with several new questions: What constitutes campaign activity online? How should spending on social media campaigns be regulated? And what about the people who are still offline?

A race for followers

More than 34m of Myanmar’s 53.7m citizens were eligible to vote in 2015, and the UEC expects that number to increase to 40m this year. 

Over 22m people in Myanmar use social media, which they see as virtually synonymous with Facebook, according to the Milan-based internet research group We Are Social. 

Of the 97 political parties the UEC has already approved to run in 2020, 64 are active on Facebook. Thirty nine of those are verified by Facebook with a signature blue check.  

With over 2.7m followers, the NLD’s Facebook page commands far more online attention than any other party page. Its closest rival, the military proxy Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), has just over 330,000 followers on its official page, though it also uses the pages of party chairman Than Htay and of its women’s and farmer’s committees to push out information. 

The National Development Party, led by former Thein Sein-advisor Nay Zin Latt, has more than 320,000 followers. The PPP has 180,000. 

Buying influence

Some politicians and election watchers have said they are concerned about well-funded campaigns gaining an unfair advantage online.  

The USDP has paid to boost both its women’s and farmer’s committee pages to reach more people, though it is unclear how much they’ve spent on this. 

The women’s committee boosted a June 6 post of a picture of Than Htay with the caption, “We will have Section 261 amended so that state and regional parliaments can appoint their own chief ministers instead of the president.” The post has more than 3,000 likes and 300 shares. 

The NLD forbids purchasing Facebook boosts for its pages, NLD central information committee member Kyi Toe told Myanmar Now. The party feels the practice disadvantages smaller, less well-funded parties.

Nay Phone Latt, an NLD MP for Thingangyun township, said wealthy parliamentary candidates could gain an unfair advantage by outspending their rivals on boosts and hiring staffers to push out false information from fake accounts.

He called on social media companies, the UEC and the parties themselves to create new campaign policies to address these concerns. 

Aung Min Khant - the 34-year-old leader of the PPP’s media team - agreed. 

The party is largely composed of tycoons and high-profile economists. Its founder and chairperson is Dagon township MP Thet Thet Khine, a former NLD member and the owner of the Golden Palace Gold and Jewelry Center. Many think this means the PPP has deep pockets for online campaigning, but, Aunt Min Khant said, this is not the case.

“We don’t have tens of millions (of kyat)” he told Myanmar Now. “We can’t buy the ads a large company can. We can only afford a few million, no more.”

Still, he said, Facebook is the best way to gain name recognition in the Covid-19 era.

For many smaller and more rural parties, however, much campaigning will still have to be done in person. 

The Taunggyi-based Shan Nationalities Democratic Party (SNDP) page has more than 30,000 followers and posts in both Burmese and Shan languages. 

While online campaigning works for urban voters, SNDP joint secretary Sai Kyaw Nyunt told Myanmar Now, it may not reach villagers. 

“The party can’t speak on social media only. We need to go to the voters where they actually are,” he said. 

The decision is also financial: smaller parties often mean smaller budgets.

“Big parties can spend more for online ads. We can’t compete there,” Sai Kyaw Nyut said. “We need to focus on real political action to stand out.” 

Thin line

Further complicating the matter is the thin line between a party’s regular social media use and an official campaign post.

USDP spokesperson Than Htun Oo said that while the ruling NLD may not boost its posts, state-run social media coverage of its Covid-19 response - including the Facebook posts of state counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi - looks a lot like campaigning. 

“Only they know if this is fair or not, but it’s one of the questions that must be asked if we are to ensure a fair election,” he said. 

Similar concerns arose over public officials’ conduct during elections in 2015, when the USDP was in power. 

President and Vice Presidents are constitutionally barred from campaigning for their parties while in office. 

In 2015, then-president Thein Sein made an official visit to a dam project near Meiktila, in Mandalay region, just weeks before the election. Many saw the laudatory state newspaper coverage that followed the visits as campaign propaganda.

The Union Betterment Party (UBP), led by former general Shwe Mann, has been holding frequent live discussions both on its official page and on Shwe Mann’s personal Facebook page. 

Those discussions have focused on the national economy, but also the charitable acts the party has been doing. 

The party’s page has more than 47,000 followers. A party leader who asked to remain anonymous told Myanmar Now the UBP will not form an official campaign media team until the election date is announced. 

Tracking spending

In theory, there are already checks in place to allay these concerns. The UEC has capped campaign spending at 10m kyat, while Facebook classifies its ads as either commercial or political. 

But Nay Phone Latt is worried some parties may buy ads labelled as commercial to get around the campaign spending cap, since Facebook does not release information on its commercial ad sales.

But UEC spokesperson Myint Naing said at a press conference in Nay Pyi Taw earlier this month the commission considers all online spending part of a campaign’s expenditures, so the commercial-political distinction shouldn’t matter. 

“The form-20 includes an ‘other’ expense category, so all spending not otherwise defined should be included in that," Myint Naing said, referring to the form all parties must use to declare expenditures. 

He said the commission does not have separate policies that are online-specific. 

A UEC member who asked for anonymity said any candidate or campaign that does not include all spending on their form-20 can be charged under election laws, but only if a complaint is filed against them. 

“They must include all the expenses related to their campaign. If not, and if someone lodges a complaint, they’ll be in trouble,” he said. 

Phyo Thiha Cho is Senior Reporter with Myanmar Now.

Announcement came as court postponed the 82-year-old’s third hearing, meaning his request for bail on health grounds was not considered 

Published on Mar 19, 2021
Win Htein arrives for the opening ceremony of the second session of the Union Peace Conference in 2017 (EPA-EFE)

Detained National League for Democracy party stalwart Win Htein is to be tried by a special tribunal of two judges following an order from the military-controlled Supreme Court, his lawyer said on Friday. 

“It was just one judge before, and now there’s two,” Min Min Soe told Myanmar Now. 

“District judge Ye Lwin will serve as chair, and deputy district judge Soe Naing will be a member of the tribunal,” she added.

Win Htein faces up to a 20-year prison sentence for sedition under section 124a of the Penal Code.

His third hearing, scheduled for Friday, was postponed, with the court citing the internet shutdown as the reason because it made video conferencing impossible, Min Min Soe said.

“The arguments will be presented at the next hearing, we applied for bail but since they’re setting up a tribunal for the lawsuit, that will be discussed at the next hearing as well,” she said.

At the second hearing on March 5, Win Htein requested an independent judgement, a meeting with his lawyer, and bail due to his health issues, but the court said those requests would be heard on March 19.

Win Htein, 82, uses a wheelchair and suffers from breathing problems that means he often requires an oxygen tank. He also suffers from diabetes, high blood pressure, hypothyroidism and benign prostatic hyperplasia. 

Min Min Soe was allowed a brief call with her client on Friday to tell him that his hearing had been postponed until April 2.

Aye Lu, the chair of the Ottara district administration council in Naypyitaw, is the plaintiff in the lawsuit against Win Htein. Ottara district is where the NLD’s temporary headquarters are located. 

Aye Lu filed the charge on February 4 and Win Htein was arrested that evening at his home in Yangon. He has been kept in the Naypyitaw detention center and denied visits from his lawyers. 

He was detained after giving media interviews in the wake of the February 1 coup in which he said military chief Min Aung Hlaing had acted on personal ambition when seizing power. 

On Wednesday the military council announced that it was investigating Aung San Suu Kyi for corruption, on top of other charges announced since her arrest.

Many other NLD leaders, party members and MPs have been arrested or are the subject of warrants.

Kyi Toe, a senior figure in the NLD, was arrested on Thursday night in Hledan, Yangon.

 

Myanmar Now is an independent news service providing free, accurate and unbiased news to the people of Myanmar in Burmese and English.

Continue Reading

The country’s military leaders have acted with impunity for decades, but now there is a mechanism to bring them to justice

Published on Mar 19, 2021
Nationwide protests against the coup have been responded with murders, torture and mass arrests by the military regime. (Myanmar Now)

On March 8, U Ko Ko Lay, a 62-year-old teacher, bled to death on a street in the Kachin state capital Myitkyina. He had been shot in the head while protesting the military coup of February 1. That same night, U Zaw Myat Lynn, an official from the National League for Democracy, was taken from his home in Shwepyithar on the outskirts of Yangon and tortured to death. The list keeps growing.

In the more than six weeks since Senior General Min Aung Hlaing seized power, images of soldiers and police officers shooting, beating, and arresting protesters have flooded social media and Myanmar and international news outlets. So far, the regime’s forces have killed well over 200 people (more than half of them in the past week) and seriously injured many more. The junta has also arrested nearly 2,200 people, some of whom, like U Zaw Myat Lynn, have died in custody.

Each day, Myanmar human rights organizations update lists with names, dates, locations, and causes of death. Around 600 police and a handful of soldiers have decided they do not want to be involved in such actions. They have left their posts and even joined the anti-coup movement.

Many soldiers, police officers, and commanding officers are acting with impunity now. But they can face prosecution, not only in Myanmar’s courts but also internationally. Like any country, Myanmar is subject to international law. Because of its history of atrocities, most recently against the Rohingya people, Myanmar is also already subject to special international legal proceedings that apply to the current situation.

The most relevant is the United Nations’ Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM). The IIMM was created in 2018 after the Myanmar military’s brutal campaign against the Rohingya people, but it applies to the whole country. Its mission is to investigate “international crimes” from 2011 to the present.

International crimes are generally defined as “widespread and systematic” in nature, involving many victims and locations. These include crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide.

In keeping with its mandate, the IIMM is collecting information on the current situation. In a statement released on February 11 (available in Myanmar here), it highlighted the “use of lethal force against peaceful protesters and the detention of political leaders, members of civil society and protesters.”

More recently, on March 17, the IIMM also called on recipients of illegal orders to share this evidence so that those ultimately responsible for these crimes can be held accountable.

"The persons most responsible for the most serious international crimes are usually those in high leadership positions. They are not the ones who physically perpetrate the crimes and often are not even present at the locations where the crimes are committed,” the head of the IIMM, Nicholas Koumjian, says in the statement (available in Myanmar here).

The crimes the IIMM investigates could be tried in Myanmar courts, courts in other countries, or international courts. International crimes are crimes that are so serious that they are considered to be against the international community, and are therefore not limited to courts in one country.

In other words, an international crime committed in Myanmar—for example, widespread and systematic attacks on civilians—can be tried in a court in another country or in an international court.

The Myanmar military is used to getting away with murder. Decades of well-documented killing, rape, and torture of civilians in ethnic minority areas have gone unpunished. No one has ever been tried for the killing of protesters during previous mass uprisings against military rule in 1988 and 2007.

But this time may be different. On March 4, the International Commission of Jurists said in a statement that “the killing of peaceful protesters by Myanmar’s security forces should be independently investigated as possible crimes against humanity.”

The IIMM is already set up and working. It provides a mechanism for just such an investigation. Those doing the shooting should be aware of this.

For further information:

The Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM) on Facebook

International Accountability Mechanisms for Myanmar (learning materials in English, Myanmar, and Karen)

Lin Htet is a pen name for a team of Myanmar and international writers

Continue Reading

A resident said armed forces used drones to monitor the crowd before opening fire on them

Published on Mar 19, 2021
Men carry a wounded protester in Aungban, Shan State, on the morning of March 19 (Supplied)

At least eight anti-coup protesters were killed in Aungban, southern Shan State, during an attack by the military junta on demonstrations on Friday morning, according to the Aungban Free Funeral Service Society.

Sixteen military trucks carrying more than 100 policemen and soldiers arrived at the protest site at around 9:00 a.m. and began shooting at protesters. Seven died at the scene, and another protester who had been shot in the neck was taken to Kalaw Hospital and died by 11:00 a.m.

All eight victims were men. 

The body of the man who died at the hospital was sent to his family’s home, but those who were killed at the protest site were taken away by the junta’s armed forces, a representative of the Free Funeral Service Society told Myanmar Now. 

Aungban resident Nay Lynn Tun told Myanmar Now that police and soldiers had destroyed the doors of nearby homes in order to arrest people, and that at least 10 people had been detained. 

“Initially, police arrived at the site. When the crowd surrounded the police, armed soldiers arrived at the site and began firing,” he told Myanmar Now. “In the coming days, if we cannot gather to protest, we will do it in our own residential areas.”

Since March 13, around 300 volunteer night guards have watched over these residential areas to protect locals from the dangers posed by the junta’s nighttime raids. These forces use drone cameras to monitor the activities of the night guards from 3:00 a.m. until 5:00 a.m. every day, Nay Lynn Tun said. 

He added that hours before Friday’s crackdown, military and police had also used drone cameras to monitor the gathering of protesters in Aungban.

Over the last week, at least 11 protesters have been arrested in Aungban. Only three-- the protesters who were minors-- were released.

South of Shan State, in the Kayah State capital of Loikaw, two pro-democracy protesters were also shot with live ammunition by the regime’s armed forces on Friday. One, 46-year-old Kyan Aung, was shot in the lower abdomen and died from his injuries. The other wounded protester was a nurse, according to eyewitnesses. 

According to a March 18 tally by the advocacy group Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, at least 224 people have been killed across the country by junta’s armed forces since the February 1 coup. Thousands more have been arrested. 

 

Myanmar Now is an independent news service providing free, accurate and unbiased news to the people of Myanmar in Burmese and English.

Continue Reading