Kyaw Min Swe, editor-in-chief of Myanmar's independent newspaper The Voice Daily, is taken away in a police van following a bail hearing in Bahan township, Yangon, June 15, 2017. (Photo: Pyae Pyae/Myanmar Now)
Ei Cherry Aung/Myanmar Now
Yangon— Terrorism, armed conflict, drug trafficking and child soldiers.These are some of the subjects that Myanmar cartoonist Maung Maung Phaung Tain gets nervous about.
He wasn’t always so worried, but a spike in online defamation cases under the current government of Aung San Suu Kyi has him on edge.
The cases have skyrocketed since Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy came to power in 2016, raising concerns about a chilling effect on freedom of expression in Myanmar.
All of them have been filed using Article 66d of the 2013 Telecommunications Act, a broadly worded law that allows individuals to be prosecuted for “extorting, coercing, restraining wrongfully, defaming, disturbing, causing undue influence or threatening any person” over a telecommunications network.
“It is quite complicated. So I seldom draw cartoons these days,” Maung Maung Phaung Tain, who draws for several local media outlets, said.
So far the cases have been limited to mostly civilian critics, who find themselves the target of a lawsuit after writing something negative about a member of the current administration. But journalists and those in the media profession have also been targeted. The law carries a maximum punishment of three years and a fine.
The poet Maung Saungkha, who spent six months in prison after being convicted under the legislation for a poem posted to Facebook, has formed a group to campaign against it while tracking the number of cases. He said that there have been 71 since the law was adopted in 2013, but only 7 of them occurred under the military-backed government of the former president Thein Sein.
Out of the total, 10 involve media professionals.
Saungkha said Article 66d allows for dangerously flexible interpretation.
“The meaning of defamation is complicated. Criticism might be wrongly interpreted as defamation under this law,” he said.
Amid mounting threats of being prosecuted, cartoonists who spoke to Myanmar Now said they practice self-censorship and have also run up against resistance from editors worried about pushing the limits.
“I continue drawing cartoons without any defamation. But some editors refused to use some of my satirical pieces,” said Mandalay-based cartoonist Hlaing Myo.
Cartooning has a long and storied history in Myanmar, with drawings capturing everything from the severity of military rule to the shortcomings of the democratic transition.
But the rise of the web has threatened the survival of the art and created new fears of repression.
“Although I am drawing cartoons regularly, media editors rejected some of my pieces, and because of that I have lost confidence,” said cartoonist Nyi Pu Che. “They have full authority in choosing and publishing our pieces.”
Lwin Min Oo, editor of the Standard Time daily, said that while there are no restrictions on the types of cartoons the paper publishes, he doesn’t see many that intensely satirize the military or the government.
However, “they often criticize Article 66d. “
Suu Kyi’s government has not been in a hurry to amend or abolish the law, even as pressure is building to take action. On June 28 more than 60 local and international organizations signed a joint statement urging the government to repeal 66d.
“In the last year, we've seen an alarming increase in the number of people being arrested and charged for their peaceful online activities – in some cases, simply sharing images or articles which mock the military or the government,” James Gomez, Amnesty International Director for South East Asia and the Pacific, said in remarks accompanying the joint statement.
“This has to stop. The government must repeal or amend repressive laws to ensure that no one can be jailed for peacefully expressing their ideas and opinions.”
Cartoonist Nyi Htwe said that he also felt insecure after a spate of rejection, but he worried about the overall impact of a society that isn’t willing to tolerate satire, describing it as helpful criticism.
“The present situation is very intimidating for us,” Nyi Htwe said.